Skip to main content

Indian Foreign Policy Evolution (1857-1947): Universal Brotherhood to Moral Nationalism



George Tanham (1992) famously argued that political elites in India showed "little evidence of having thought coherently or systematically about national strategy." This narrative is build upon the old idea of India under British rule but no doubt; it holds some merit in saying this. Indian foreign policy objectives were never clearly defined. It doesn't make sense advocating 'non-alignment' policy and securing a friendship treaty with one of the powers. Neither it makes sense having a closer ties with the US but expecting Russia to remain friend. India always has this contradictory foreign policy approach since late 19th century. Indian view on world politics still resembles the precedents rooted in the past.
If we have a closer look between 1857 to 1947, we might get some clue on why India lacks a cohesive foreign policy outlook.

The 19th Century India
The Indian view on International Relations was shaped by three underpinning thoughts:
1. Universal Brotherhood
2. The Ancient Wisdom on Statecraft
3. Liberal Nationalism 

1. Universal Brotherhood

Om Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah
Sarve Santu Niraamayaah |
Sarve Bhadraanni Pashyantu
Maa Kashcid-Duhkha-Bhaag-Bhavet |
Om Shaantih Shaantih Shaantih ||

Meaning: 
1: Om, May the entire Humanity be Happy & Prosperous ,
2: May entire Humanity be Free from blemish /filth,garbage physically /mentally
3: May the entire Humanity See what is Auspicious,
4: May no one pass through Pain /Agony and Suffering .
5: Om Peace, Peace, Peace.

The 19th century thinkers like Keshub Chandra Sen and Swami Vivekananda professed spiritual and moral unity of human race. After 1857 Indian Revolution, the Britishers consolidated India and its boundaries and imposed harsh regulating acts. Sen once gave a lecture on a topic titled Jesus Christ: Europe and Asia, examining how Indians and Englishmen might regulate their relations. He argued that English instead of forgiveness inculcated by Christ, took the road of repression of Indian masses. Similarly, in another lecture (Asia's Message to the Europe) given in Calcutta 1883, he argued for peaceful coexistence. 

Swami Vivekananda forwarded Hinduism as a way to universal brotherhood. He observed that Europe was trying to understand: "how much a man can have, how much more power a man can possess by hook or crook".  Nations continue to fail and rise, what makes them survive - by "giving up senses". This was where India stood out. India was the "only nation that never went beyond its frontiers to cut the throats of its neighbors". To sum up, he professed "the spirtiualization of human race" as a way out of world-conflict.

2. The Ancient Wisdom on Statecraft
Long-before the influential book on statecraft, The Prince, by Nicholas Machiavelli, Indian ancient books such as Hitopadesa, Manu Smirti, Nitisara, Agni Purana and Arthashastra provided in-depth prescriptions on how a ruler should conduct foreign affairs. For instance, in the Book VII of Manu Smirti, the rulers are instructed to 'strive to gain' what they have not yet gained, and to carefully preserve 'what they have already gained'. 

3. Liberal Nationalism
Liberal nationalism were propounded by Dadabhai Nauroji, Pherozshah Mehta and Gopal Krishna Gokhale, deeply influenced by French Revolution and American independence. For instance, Nauroji called on British to refrain from Opium Trade with China. 

In the next blog titled "Moral Nationalism", I will cover this topic with special reference to Tilak, Bankimchandra and Aurobindo Ghosh. 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

What is Mercantilist Theory of International Political Economy?

  Mercantilists slogan was "export more, import less." During the 16th and 17th centuries, states were the main players of global economies and they encouraged exports over imports to finance their huge armies. Similar to realists, mercantilists argued that economic policies should advance state power.  They believed accumulation of metals (gold and silver) was more important than trade as it increased the national wealth. So national economies that time were measured on how much gold one country had not how much trade they had. Spain's conquest of Latin American countries: Panama, West Indies, Venezuela and Peru, provided abundance of gold mines and Spaniards became extensively rich. Spain also put restriction on the colonial trades. colonies couldn't trade with other countries. Mercantilism thrived in Europe from the exploitation of colonies. Soon other European countries joined the loot of colonies in Africa, Asia and elsewhere.  Mercantilists as with realists arg...
Post a Comment
Read more

A short note on US Sub-Prime Lending Crisis 2007-8

 The “Great Recession” in 2008 showed the weaknesses in Western economic models. The crisis highlighted the differences in political and economic paths adopted by Western and Asian countries. It all started in late 1990s, when American real estate prices were soaring and banks provided mortgages to anyone without income guarantee until 2007 when the real estate prices fell and borrowers defaulted on their repayments. But before we analyze the crisis, it’s necessary to understand the western economic liberal policies which led to it. After decades of government intervention, the US President Ronald Reagan and the UK PM Margret Thatcher started to “roll back the state” from national economies. They demanded a return to Adam Smith’s liberal policies which were encourage individual realization and reducing the social welfare spending. The renewed belief in ‘market’ and ‘invisible hand’ led them to believe that market itself would provide welfare for all. Western Liberal Economy Lib...
Post a Comment
Read more

A short note on Asian Financial Crisis 1997-98

 The miraculous rise of Japanese economy in 1970-80s inspired many Asian countries to adopt state driven growth model. East and Southeast Asian countries mirrored the Japanese economies policies and registered an impressive growth during 1980s. These countries were nicknamed “Asian Tigers”. However, the growth bubble burst in July 1997 in Asia and soon it became a global crisis. Asian Tigers’ economic growth were based upon the two important pillars provided by people and government, respectively. Asian countries faced low inflation and high employment rates as people were willing to work long hours at lower wages. And governments worked as catalyst providing capital and tax benefits to domestic industries. They selected industries which could successfully compete with foreign firms. Banks provided credit to businesses as per the government policies. Banks’s Overseas Borrowings: Lower Interest Rates in the US The US interest rates were much lower than Asian rates. Thus, Asian ban...
Post a Comment
Read more