Skip to main content

What is Stagflation and Hyperinflation?

 In simple terms, inflation is a measure of general increase in prices across the economy. Usually denoted in percentage (%), inflation keep fluctuating over the time. Contrary to common perception, a mild inflation is quite necessary for the growth of an economy. However, beyond a certain limit, the higher inflation rate could lead to hyper-inflation or stagflation. Inflation is a quantitative measure of the rate at which the average prices of a basket of goods and services in an economy.  

What is Hyperinflation?

When inflation rate keep rising at a faster rate, a period of hyperinflation can occur. Usually, when inflation rate keep rising at more than 50% continuously for months, the economy can grip under a period of hyperinflation. 

For example, the German inflation rate reached 30000% per month during 1920s and people started to use currency notes as a fuel in winters. 

What is Stagflation?

When an economy starts to stagnate but a higher inflation persists, it can be termed as a stagflation. It can be an economic disaster as it can ensue a poor economic growth, high unemployment and severe inflation. It rarely occurs but during 1970s, the US and UK economies suffered due to a short period of stagflation. 

Stagflation: A Nightmare for Central Banks

Stagflation is one of the most problematic situation to manage for Central Banks. It becomes difficult as there are few avenues for central banks to explore. Generally, when inflation rises beyond a certain limit, central banks like RBI or US Federal Reserve increases the interest rate (bank rate, repo rate) which reduces the money supply in the economy. But in case of stagflation, if they increase the interest rates, the credit available for businesses will be reduced so no economic expansion will take place. And that will increase the unemployment. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Mercantilist Theory of International Political Economy?

  Mercantilists slogan was "export more, import less." During the 16th and 17th centuries, states were the main players of global economies and they encouraged exports over imports to finance their huge armies. Similar to realists, mercantilists argued that economic policies should advance state power.  They believed accumulation of metals (gold and silver) was more important than trade as it increased the national wealth. So national economies that time were measured on how much gold one country had not how much trade they had. Spain's conquest of Latin American countries: Panama, West Indies, Venezuela and Peru, provided abundance of gold mines and Spaniards became extensively rich. Spain also put restriction on the colonial trades. colonies couldn't trade with other countries. Mercantilism thrived in Europe from the exploitation of colonies. Soon other European countries joined the loot of colonies in Africa, Asia and elsewhere.  Mercantilists as with realists arg...

A short note on US Sub-Prime Lending Crisis 2007-8

 The “Great Recession” in 2008 showed the weaknesses in Western economic models. The crisis highlighted the differences in political and economic paths adopted by Western and Asian countries. It all started in late 1990s, when American real estate prices were soaring and banks provided mortgages to anyone without income guarantee until 2007 when the real estate prices fell and borrowers defaulted on their repayments. But before we analyze the crisis, it’s necessary to understand the western economic liberal policies which led to it. After decades of government intervention, the US President Ronald Reagan and the UK PM Margret Thatcher started to “roll back the state” from national economies. They demanded a return to Adam Smith’s liberal policies which were encourage individual realization and reducing the social welfare spending. The renewed belief in ‘market’ and ‘invisible hand’ led them to believe that market itself would provide welfare for all. Western Liberal Economy Lib...

What is US Indo -Pacific Strategy?

  The US President Donald Trump release a document named "Free and Open Indo-Pacific" (FOIP) in 2017 at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) summit. The Trump administration sees "Indo-Pacific Region" as a central foreign and economic policy for dealing with China. However, there are still fewer countries who have adopted the term "Indo-Pacific", they still term the region as "Asia-Pacific". Why the US is focused on Indo-Pacific region? Is it to counter China or something else is going on? The US partners such as Japan and South Korea have been cautious in their approach. So why does the US changed the name from Asia to Indo-Pacific? The term Indo-Pacific has enjoyed growing popularity in Japan, the US, Australia, India and France. It has become a kind of geopolitical nomenclature, which has nothing to do with term itself, rather it perceives as a US strategy to counter China in the Indian Ocean and Pacific Ocean. The ever-expanding Chine...