Skip to main content

What is Dependency Theory of International Political Economy?


Wikipedia Commons


 Like Wallerstein, Dependency Theory emerged in Latin America which argued that world trading system benefited only advanced capitalists' economies. Often the Terms of Trade favored these countries over the least developing countries (LDCs). 

Terms of Trade = Export Prices / Import Prices

LDC economies depend upon export of raw materials and agricultural commodities. And they import finished products from developed countries. 

As the commodity prices rise slowly but manufactured product prices rise sharply, the terms of trade would deteriorate for LDCs unless their exports rise faster than the imports. The global trade is done mostly by corporate subsidiaries thus commodity prices are not exposed to market. These giant corporations often secure the deal with long term agreements, thus even though commodity prices might have rose but they would pay what was agreed in the agreement. They also have sophisticated accounting devices which enable them to avoid paying taxes. They often artificially overprice the products in high-tax countries and underprice where taxes are low. 

Many LDCs depend upon export of single commodity or raw materials. If the international prices of commodities decline, they often resort to international creditors which increases the national debt for LDCs. 

It creates a vicious cycle of rich getting richer and poor becoming poorer. 

How to incorporate favorable Terms of Trade for LDCs?

  • Reduce imports
  • Become self-reliant
  • State control over the economy

Failure of Dependency Policies

Initially, Latin American countries enjoyed some success by adopting Dependency theory recommendations in 1980s. 

But developing own industries and investing in agriculture required capital, but capital was available through only foreign loans. A country couldn't print as much as currency as they want as it would cause hyperinflation. So LDCs borrowed heavily for development from international creditors such as US, European Union, World Bank and IMF. But when the commodity prices fell, their ability to pay the debt was reduced. The Latin American debt reached to a new height and quadrupled between 1975 and 1982. 

The failure of Marxian economic analysis, renewed the interest in free market, and countries started to compete for Foreign Direct Investments (FDI). But FDIs reached only to those countries which de-regularized their economies, reducing the state capabilities to continue welfare measures. 

Currently, despite the rise of economic nationalism, free market model is the most dominating system of International Political Economy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Indian Foreign Policy Evolution (1857-1947): Universal Brotherhood to Moral Nationalism

George Tanham (1992) famously argued that political elites in India showed "little evidence of having thought coherently or systematically about national strategy." This narrative is build upon the old idea of India under British rule but no doubt; it holds some merit in saying this. Indian foreign policy objectives were never clearly defined. It doesn't make sense advocating 'non-alignment' policy and securing a friendship treaty with one of the powers. Neither it makes sense having a closer ties with the US but expecting Russia to remain friend. India always has this contradictory foreign policy approach since late 19th century. Indian view on world politics still resembles the precedents rooted in the past. If we have a closer look between 1857 to 1947, we might get some clue on why India lacks a cohesive foreign policy outlook. The 19th Century India The Indian view on International Relations was shaped by three underpinning thoughts: 1. Universal Brotherhood ...

Making sense of Huntington's "Clash of Civilizations"

 After 27 years when Samuel P Huntington's article titled "Clash of Civilizations published in the Foreign Affairs magazine, there are people (mostly liberal) who completely refute to acknowledge any cultural clashes, and conservatives who believe in everything that is argued in the article. The truth lies in between, thus I will try to answer objectively in the question-answer format. Q. What is all about Clash of Civilization? A. The crux of Huntington's article is that future conflicts will mostly occur on the line of culture and civilization. According to Huntington, "world-politics is entering a new phase" in which "the fundamental source of conflict will "occur between nations and groups of civilizations".  Q. How many civilizations did Samuel Huntington see in the world? A. Huntington identifies eight major civilizations in the world: 1. Western  2. Confucian 3. Japanese 4. Islamic  5. Hindu 6. Orthodox  7. Latin American 8. African Q. How ...